|
|
|

Who We Are
We are a medical-legal search and referral firm
based in Los Angeles with experts and clients nationwide. We offer medical and
biomedical experts in virtually all specialties and sub-specialties. We also can
provide paramedical experts such as dentists, EMTs, podiatrists or registered
nurses.
Our experts will serve as consultants and expert witnesses for nearly every legal proceeding requiring medical or similar expertise. Our clients include attorneys, both plaintiff and defense, insurance companies and HMOs, government agencies and private individuals in every state and several foreign countries.
We specialize in referrals of
experts in hard to find specialties or with highly specialized clinical or
research experience. We represent panel experts that are contracted with us and
independents who deal directly with our clients. For fees and referral policies,
please click on the memorandum for attorneys in the left sided panel.
We also offer a preliminary review at a reduced price for those
lawyers and individuals that are
uncertain about the merits of their case. Medical reviewers are all
board-certified and many experts do
both expert consultation and medical review.
Contact
Us
Contact us by telephone (local or
toll-free), fax, e-mail or regular mail. We will respond quickly. We offer a
free of charge discussion of your case and expert requirements with our
executive director. He has been an expert witness for more than 25 years and is
uniquely qualified to assist you in evaluating your case.
MedicoLegal Consultants
Toll-Free: 1-888-661-3593
11041 Santa Monica Blvd. #719
Tel: (310) 444-7960
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Fax: (310) 444-7912
E-mail: experts@mlegal.com
Medical-Legal News & Comment*

Eighteen California Hospitals Fined by the State
The Los Angeles Times 08/19/08
Eighteen hospitals, mostly in Southern California,
have been fined by the state
public health department for placing patients in danger or outright malpractice.
The
usual fine is $25,000 per incident. Some of the
fines were for particularly egregious mishaps:
patients falling off the operating table or out
of a wheelchair, overdoses causing death, sponges
or other surgical instruments left in place
requiring a second surgery for removal, mislabeling of a
tissue sample leading to unnecessary surgery and
many other "never" events. The list of hospitals
fined includes such prestigious institutions as
UCLA-Harbor, Los Angeles County-USC and Loma Linda
University medical centers as well as several
Kaiser hospitals. Prospective patients: beware!
Partisan Expert Witnesses Unique in the American Justice System
The New York Times 08/11/08
The American practice of experts hired by the
prosecution and by the defense in
civil and criminal cases is rare beyond the U.S. borders. In most countries the
court appoints independent experts to provide
technical opinions while in some, like Australia,
the witnesses for each side appear together and
cross-examine each other. All too often in the
U.S. system the expert opinions conform to those
favorable to the side signing the paycheck.
Sometimes, when expert opinions are in
significant conflict, the judge must step in and hire his
own expert or throw out the opinions of the
experts from both sides.
More Snooping of Patient Records at UCLA Medical Center
The Los Angeles Times 08/05/08
The urge by unauthorized personnel to look
at patient records, especially those of
the rich and famous seems irresistible, at least at UCLA Medical Center. The
number
of UCLA staff members implicated in spying on
patients records is now up to 127 with no end in sight.
Several of these medical paparazzi have been
dismissed or disciplined and one enterprising employee
who used her supervisor's password to gain access
to the records of celebrity patients has now
been indicted. The latter included social
security numbers as well as much medical and personal
information, some of which was allegedly sold to
the tabloids. The hospital claims they have
upgraded their computer security system that
allowed such easy access to patient records.

Supreme Court Tightens Scope of False Claims Act
American Medical News 07/28/08
The U.S. Supreme Court recently narrowed the
application of the False Claims Act
that the government has often used to pursue
health care providers or purveyors of
medical equipment. The main sticking point
involves contractors that do not bill the government
directly but go through a third party. Can the
former be held liable for a fraudulent claim by the latter?
Congress has been seeking to tighten the rules
regarding such claims and this ruling in
Allison Engine
Co. Inc. v. United States
may give them added impetus.
New Jersey Judge Throws Out HRT Product Liability Cases
New Jersey Law Journal 07-15-08
A New Jersey Superior Court judge has dismissed two product liability lawsuits
against the makers
of Prempro, Premarin and Provera, well
established hormone replacement drugs intended to
minimize menopausal symptoms. The plaintiffs
contended that the drugs increased the risk of breast
cancer and that the manufacturers, Wyeth,
Phamacia and Upjohn Co., did not include adequate
label warnings. However the drug labels were
approved by the FDA and the court rejected the
argument that the makers should have conducted
additional studies prior to marketing. The
decision, now on appeal, casts doubt on the
validity of some 168 pending New Jersey HRT cases.
FDA Mandates a Black Box Warning for Tendon
Rupture Related to Fluoroquinolone Drugs
Medscape Medical News 07-09-08
The FDA has
required the makers of fluoroquinolone antibiotics to publish a so-called "black
box"
warning about the increased risk of tendon
rupture related to use of the drug. The warning is
usually placed in prescribing information for
physicians that accompany the drug and also in
prescribing guides such as the Physician's Desk
Reference. This category includes Cipro, Levaquin,
Floxin, Noroxin and several other drugs of this
widely prescribed chemical class. Though Achilles
tendon ruptures have been most frequently
reported, shoulder and hand tendons have also been
affected. Doubtless this serious complication
will be the basis for product liability lawsuits.
Serious Patient Errors at California Hospitals
Disclosed in State Filings
The Los Angeles Times 07-01-08
Some 1,002 cases of serious medical harm
were disclosed by California hospitals between July 2007
and May of this year. The disclosures are the first
under a state law that requires hospitals to inform
health regulators of all substantial injuries to
their patients.
Revelations of such errors have led
lawmakers and hospital associations in at least
seven states to protect patients from having to pay
for the cost of care that went awry. In
Sacramento, an assemblyman proposed a ban on reimbursing
hospitals for the types of injuries tracked by
the state. But when lobbyists for doctors and hospitals
objected, he scaled it back to cover far fewer
errors. Many of these errors occurred despite safeguards
specifically designed to prevent
harm.
*Important
medical-legal news. See
Medicolegal News for additional links.
|
|
Next Month
More articles, book reviews and news and comment
from the medical-legal
world. Don't forget our experts!
©
Copyright 2008 by MedicoLegal Consultants. All rights reserved. This page
updated August 19, 2008.