|
Book Review
Spring 2006
Generation Rx
How Prescription Drugs Are Altering
American Lives, Minds and Bodies
By
Greg Critser
Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, 2005: 308 pp. (with notes and
index)
This topical book details the modern, often sordid, history of the
pharmaceutical industry (big pharma).
A lot of insider stuff is chronicled and the battles with the FDA and
Congress, generic drug companies,
physicians and consumer advocate groups are all described in some detail.
Landmarks such as the
Kefauver hearings of the 1960s, the Hatch-Waxman act, conflicts with a variety of FDA
commissioners,
direct to consumer advertising (DTC), off-label prescribing right up to the recent Medicare part D
drug
plan are included.
Many of the
drugs cited are common household names: Seldane, the first major drug
promoted directly
via DTC and later recalled; the marketing campaigns for Paxil and Zoloft in
an attempt to compete with
Prozac; the invention of a new name for heartburn (GERD) to promote Zantac and
assist Glaxo's war on
Tagamet; the marketing of Wellbutrin as a smoking deterrent when doctors were
not prescribing it much
for depression, the Lotronex story, initially approved for irritable bowel syndrome and
later recalled for
severe gastrointestinal side effects, only to be re-released with major use restrictions. The
story of the
advertising for these and other drugs offers an inside and often fascinating view of how the drug
companies have allowed marketing to dictate science.
One of the
best features of this account are the personal glimpses of the
pharmaceutical company
CEOs and other executives. For example, Jan Leschly, former Danish tennis
star who morphed into
executive spots at Squibb and later SmithKline Beecham, only to be phased out by a
takeover despite
some brilliant career moves. Or Tony Wild, who turned Parke Davis around with insightful
marketing
strategy for Neurontin and later Lipitor and the birth control pill Loestrin. His targeting of the doctors
most likely to prescribe his drugs and more importantly to convince others to do so practically defines
the art
of data mining. Or Bill Steere at Phizer who purchased Parke Davis, revolutionized marketing,
and turned his
company into the largest pharmaceutical house in the world. Thus Lipitor became the
bestselling statin drug
not by preventing heart attacks but largely by stressing cholesterol numbers in
its ads; and Viagra by
inventing erectile dysfunction, a "new" disease that used to be called impotence,
hawked by TV ads featuring athletes
and Bob Dole; or Rezulin for diabetes type 2, emphasizing the
reduction in the need for multiple insulin
injections, outweighing possible liver toxicity.
Drug approval
by the FDA was generally speeded up despite calls for caution by some
medical and
consumer groups. Mostly this was a result of the new laws allowing the drug
companies to pay a fee
to the agency for rapid review and by the "expedited review" for new drugs that were
intended for
conditions without current drugs already on the market. Of course politics always plays it's
role as in
the current Plan B "morning after pill" to over-the-counter status controversy. Still, disease activist
groupsfor AIDS and breast and prostate cancer and the anti-smoking campaign have speeded up the
new drug process
by lobbying Congress and laws allowing companies to utilize research and drug
development by government
scientists (NIH, CDC, etc.). The latter may alleviate the relative lack of
new drugs emerging from the
companies' own R&D divisions over the past few years.
The book is
fairly short, easy to read and unsparing in its views; yet this is no
diatribe. The author,
a California based journalist and medical writer, devotes a chapter to reviewing
some of pharma's
newer marketing techniques. Many of these are based on data mining doctor and pharmacy records
and utilizing this data to target certain physicians and patient groups for intense advertising of a drug's
merits. Similar techniques are used to recruit volunteers to participate in new drug clinical trials, usually
speeding up the process of getting a new drug to market. Pre-approval branding of a new drug also
allows advertising
before it reaches the market and begins earning money for the company.
Mr. Critser
divides up Generation Rx into three groups: children (and some adults)
with ADD (ADHD)
with their Ritalin and other amphetamine-like drugs; middle-agers and their
remedies for chronic
diseases such as medicines for high cholesterol, hypertension, osteoporosis and diabetes; and
the
elderly with drugs to keep them youthful such as Viagra, Botox or hormone therapy (HCG, estrogen or
anabolic
steroids). Each group is subject to a sophisticated marketing campaign by the drug companies,
letting the
folk know about disorders and drugs they never knew about.
The author
devotes a section of the book to drug toxicity and the eternal battle of
the consumer
groups and the scientific community with the FDA. He points out that
genetic-influenced drug
metabolism is critical to safety and individuals vary considerably in their ability to
metabolize
pharmaceuticals. But genetic screening, even when possible, is impractical and expensive, a least
for now.
The story of David Graham, the FDA drug safety officer who battled his FDA superiors over
Rezulin for
diabetes and Arava for arthritis, has been made public through Congressional hearings well
covered by the media.
Unfortunately, even the most effective and useful prescription drugs may
assault the liver, heart, lungs or
kidneys of some individuals. Figuring the cost/benefit ratio requires
long hours of studying post-marketing safety
data by a staff that is undermanned and under funded.
Often the data are ambiguous or incomplete and the
conclusions are vilified by pharmaceutical
executives if their product is questioned.
Still,
Critser may be a bit overzealous in his critique of prescription drugs.
They are largely responsible
for the increased average lifespan of the past 30 years and the
rejuvenation of the elderly such that 75
or 80 is now what 65 used to be. True, there are many unfortunate side effects
and some drugs should
never have been allowed on the market, but overall, the picture is brighter than
the author believes. One
must be realistic, diet and exercise or refraining from smoking or
alcohol or psychotherapy or any forms
of healthy
lifestyle choices will never outweigh the ease and convenience of popping a pill. Yes, there
are numerous changes that
could improve things such as better regulation of the drug firms by the FDA
and larger and more
complete clinical trials not funded by the industry and improved post-marketing
safety analysis of drugs that do make
it to drugstore shelves. Like so much else in our capitalistic society,
there may always be a tension
between the marketplace and the desire for the safest possible effective
drugs.
Home
More Book Reviews
Copyright ©
2006 by MedicoLegal Consultants. All rights reserved.
This page posted March 10, 2006.