|
Book Review
Summer 2008
The Criminalization of Medicine
America's War on Doctors
By Ronald T. Libby
Praeger Publishers, Westport CT, PP.209, 2008
Doctors have become the victims of the U.S. government's
largely unsuccessful war on drugs. Initially
they were only collateral damage with a few corrupt bad
actors caught up in the DEA and local law
enforcement dragnet. More recently, many have become the
target of these agencies due to the rising
tide of prescription drug abuse and the poor results in
curbing illegal drug trafficking. Similarly the
prosecution of physicians for alleged Medicare and Medicaid
fraud has been on the rise. Whether this
has been a result of better investigatory techniques or
political pressure to save money at all costs,
or both, is hard to prove but the fact remains that more
health professionals are being fined or going
to jail for defrauding these government assistance programs.
These
are the subjects of Ronald Libby's new book. He is a professor of
political science and a senior
research fellow affiliated with the University of North
Florida and an acknowledged expert on public
health policy. To get our attention he starts his book with
the sad tale of a young doctor, a pain
specialist with a bright career ahead, who falls victim to
the aggressive tactics of the DEA. Claiming
he over-prescribed OxyContin, his offices were raided and he
lost his DEA license. Subsequently he
fell into a deep depression and wound up committing suicide,
a tragic but not unknown ending. It
seems as if the DEA has determined that only cancer patients
should be allowed opiate analgesics as
if other diseases: neuropathies, arthritis, spinal stenosis,
fibromyalgia, migraines etc. may always be
treated with lesser, non-narcotic pain killers or perhaps
none at all. The paradox is that aspirin or
NSAID drugs are often riskier in long term use than are the
opioids.
The main problem is differentiating the true addicts from
those who are merely drug dependent, a
subtle but critical difference. It is extremely hard to
addict a true pain patient to opiate drugs but
true addicts are clever and deceptive and doctors are not
trained as policeman; nor do they have
access to criminal databases as does law enforcement. Perhaps
they should. Nor is there yet a
centralized electronic medical record system that might
identify those who "doctor shop" to get
multiple prescriptions for controlled substances.
Unfortunately pain has no blood test or imaging study
to document its presence or severity; it is purely subjective
and physicians tend to believe patients
that claim to be in pain. Some state medical boards have
initiated penalties for the inadequate
treatment of pain but physicians remain reluctant to possibly
invite the anti-drug authorities interest.
The
author makes the relevant point that the war on drugs in largely based
on interdiction at the
U.S. border. The illegal drugs are largely manufactured and
distributed by criminal or rebel groups
in foreign countries such as Columbia or Mexico; or in
Afghanistan where, despite a huge military
presence, the U.S. has been unable or unwilling to stop the
heroin trafficking. Street sales are
hard to spot and carry no record. How much easier it is to
target physicians for alleged drug diversion
since in most states, prescription records for the controlled
substances may easily be obtained from
pharmacies or doctors' offices directly and it is relatively
easy to get addicts and dealers to testify
against the prescribing doctor in order to escape or diminish
prison sentences.
The
author then takes on the government's medical fraud bueauracracy that
has led to the career-
ending downfall of many innocent physicians and even those
who have committed "honest mistakes."
Such practices as basing pay raises and promotions on quotas
of indicted doctors or fines collected
are the rule for federal fraud investigators. Mr. Libby terms
this "medical McCarthyism" wherein just
the allegation of fraud may be enough to coerce doctors into
paying heavy fines or face prison terms
without exercise of redress to the courts. Often the
government agency's funding is contingent upon
how much they collect: one HHS agency quota deemed a ratio of
five or six to one for the amount
recovered to the cost of the investigation as what was
expected of the investigators. One physician
that decided to fight a charge of Medicaid fraud and go to
court eventually settled for a relatively
minor sum when most of the charges were dropped but was
bankrupted by the legal fees and barred
from Medicare anyway.
Several chapters are devoted to detailed narratives of physicians
accused of fraud and filing false
claims with Medicare, mostly for "up-coding" patient
treatments (submitting bills for services greater
than those actually rendered or not given at all. The results
are downright frightening. One family
practitioner working for the air force lost essentially all
her property and her marriage after a
five year battle due to astronomical fines and legal fees. A
psychiatrist was subject to a similar
attack by federal prosecutors and wound up broke and a
suicide. A very successful ophthalmologist
in California was harassed by both the federal prosecutors
and the state medical board for
allegedly performing unnecessary cataract surgeries, fined
and forced to repay over $1 million, lost
his medical license and spent five years of an 11 year
sentence in federal prison. The collusion of
between private insurance companies seeking to cut costs and
law enforcement seeking to
bring down high profile physicians is astounding. Such terms
as prosecutorial overreach and witch
hunt are used by the author and appropriately so. Perhaps the
worst is that the fundamental legal
concept of innocent until proven guilty is abridged in many
of these cases and that even if criminal
charges cannot be sustained, civil proceedings are undertaken
against the unfortunate victims
resulting in severe financial penalties and confiscatory
legal fees.
The author then returns to the war on drugs, citing an
interesting historical social phenomenon, the
cyclic history of drug tolerance and intolerance. From
the relatively laissez-faire attitudes of the
1880s to about 1920 drugs were not only tolerated but
cocaine, opiates and alcohol were
incorporated into many over-the-counter nostrums. During
prohibition the government began to
regulate the distribution of these products only to see the
down cycle begin again in the 1960-1980
period. From then on, possibly due to the crack epidemic of
the 1980s, the war on drugs began in
earnest and heavy fines and long prison sentences became the
norm. Sadly, many well-meaning
physicians were targeted as "drug dealers," perhaps more
to establish records and reputations for
prosecutors than any safety net for unsuspecting patients.
After
detailing the details of several unfortunate doctors caught up in the
drug dragnet, Mr. Libby
compares the doctors' sad fate to the scapegoating of other
ethnic or political targets during
previous times of social unrest: the communist witch hunts of
the 1950s or the lynching of blacks
during the depression era. While this may be stretching the
point a bit, it would be hard to convince
physicians, especially those that treat pain, otherwise.
Although some of the legal manipulations
and court procedures used to persecute rather than prosecute
these doctors are so excessive and
hard to believe, they are the armamentarium of overzealous
DEA agents and reputation-seeking
prosecutors.
A
worthwhile book by an author who carries appropriate credentials. If
there is a tendency to
bog down in some of the detailed case histories, the treatise
is quite short at only 183 pages.
Despite this, the point comes across loud and clear.
More Book Reviews
Copyright ©
2008 by MedicoLegal Consultants. All rights reserved.
This page posted June 22, 2008